Key result
Quadruple PFA ensures persistent lesion effects at 60 seconds versus single or double applications.
Why the study?
Pulsed field ablation with a pentaspline catheter is increasingly used for pulmonary vein isolation, but standardized methods to assess durable lesion formation are lacking.
Do quadruple pulsed field ablation applications improve persistent lesion formation compared to single or double applications in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?
Cohort (n=83)
Do quadruple pulsed field ablation applications improve persistent lesion formation compared to single or double applications in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?
Quadruple pulsed field ablation applications with a pentaspline catheter are required to ensure persistent lesion effects, which can be accurately confirmed using specific electrogram cutoffs.
Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) using a pentaspline catheter is increasingly applied for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, but standardized methods to assess durable lesion formation are lacking. Objective We aimed to investigate the impact of incremental PFA applications on electrogram (EGM) characteristics and determine whether EGM signatures serve as markers for effective lesions. Methods PV EGMs of a cohort of consecutive patients were analyzed before and after single, double, and quadruple PFA applications. Bipolar voltage amplitude (BVA) and signal power in different frequency bands (>50 Hz, >75 Hz, and >125 Hz [HF125]) were quantified. EGMs were reassessed after 60 seconds, and pacing was performed to evaluate PV pace capture. Results This analysis included 4230 EGMs of 83 patients. Immediately after ablation, no differences in BVA and frequency power were observed between groups. After 60 seconds, significant differences were present for all features in the single, double, and quadruple groups: BVA (0.27 mV vs 0.26 mV vs 0.13 mV), >50 Hz (39 μV2 vs 35 μV2 vs 8 μV2), >75 Hz (10 μV2 vs 13 μV2 vs 3 μV2), and HF125 (3 μV2 vs 2 μV2 vs 1 μV2). EGM features recovered within 60 seconds in the single and double groups but not in the quadruple group. Pace capture at 5 V was best predicted by an HF125 threshold of 2.5 μV2 and a BVA threshold of 0.28 mV. Conclusion Only quadruple PFA applications ensured persistent lesion effects over the observation period. A combined end point using an HF125 cutoff of 2.5 μV2 and BVA cutoff of 0.28 mV may provide accurate confirmation of PV isolation with the pentaspline catheter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schlageter et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary vein isolation (n=83). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) vs. Comparison between single, double, and quadruple applications was evaluated on Electrogram characteristics (bipolar voltage amplitude and signal power) at 60 seconds. Quadruple pulsed field ablation applications ensured persistent lesion effects at 60 seconds, whereas electrogram features recovered in single and double application groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: