Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis resolves the mystery of Irish d’ and its role in initial consonant mutation, highlighting phonology's influence.
This paper resolves an apparent paradox arising in an autosegmental account of Irish initial consonant mutation: the unexpected distribution of preverbal tense particle d’ . Although d’ is usually taken to be the “trigger” of mutation, the conditions for its insertion seem to depend on the post-mutation form of the following word. It thus appears that the mutation trigger enters the derivation only after mutation has taken place. I consider two modularity-compatible solutions that differ only in where they place the burden of explanation for this pattern (i.e., on the morphosyntax or the phonology). Using evidence from both modules, I conclude in favor of the “phonological solution”: preverbal d’ is an underlyingly floating segment that is inserted in all phonological environments; and its distribution follows from the regular phonology. I thus demonstrate that (i) the Irish preverbal d’ pattern is compatible with strict modularity; and (ii) a methodology that commits to a priori modular assumptions can lead to important insights concerning the division of labor at the morphosyntax-phonology interface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna Laoide-Kemp (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: