Develops a biomarker model estimating dementia risk in mild cognitive impairment, suggesting a strong vascular role.
Background Progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia arises from heterogeneous mechanisms involving Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and vascular factors. Objective This study aimed to develop a multimodal biomarker model to estimate the risk of dementia progression and to examine whether carotid atherosclerosis provides independent prognostic value, particularly in amyloid-β (Aβ)-negative MCI. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 300 individuals with MCI who underwent baseline [ 18 F]florbetapir PET, structural MRI, carotid Doppler ultrasound, cognitive assessments, and APOE genotyping (2018–2021). Participants were followed for a total of 37 months to dementia based on longitudinal cognitive and functional decline, independent of follow-up amyloid PET findings. Aβ positivity was defined using Brain Amyloid Plaque Load criteria. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. Results Among 189 Aβ-positive individuals, 30.7% (n = 58) progressed to Aβ-positive AD dementia, while 9.0% (n = 10) of 111 Aβ-negative individuals developed non-AD dementia. Independent factors estimating Aβ-positive AD dementia included higher Aβ burden (OR 2.34, p < 0.001), smaller hippocampal volume (OR 0.71, p < 0.001), greater carotid plaque count (OR 1.45, p = 0.001), lower Mini-Mental State Examination (OR 1.11, p = 0.002), and APOE ε4 carriage (OR 1.82, p = 0.021). The integrated model showed excellent performance (AUC 0.903; 95% CI: 0.814–0.968). In Aβ-negative MCI, carotid plaque burden was the primary estimator of non-AD dementia progression. Conclusions The prominent prognostic role of carotid plaques in Aβ-negative MCI underscores the vascular contributions to non-amyloid cognitive decline and highlights the importance of evaluating both AD-related and vascular mechanisms in prodromal dementia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: