Demonstrates deductive logic in strategic foresight cases, suggesting a scientific approach grounded in cosmic axioms.
Based on the core axioms of Dao Meta-Theory, this paper systematically interprets an axiomatic deduction paradigm anchored in Ultimate Meta-Onto. Anchored by the Five Negations as negative axioms to lock the logical origin, connected by the Triadic Architecture of The Dao as the Heart-Mind, the Cosmos as the Body, Information as the Mediator to bridge noumenon and phenomena, and guided by the Law of Information Convergence and Dispersion as well as the Law of Unidirectional Bestowal as deductive principles, this paradigm constructs a source-level cognitive pathway independent of empirical induction. This paper selects ten cross-domain strategic foresight cases — covering technological iteration, the rise and fall of corporate strategies, macro-risk early warning, and geopolitical civilizational rivalries — traces the deductive logic behind each case item by item, verifying the repeatability of this paradigm in penetrating appearances and clarifying cognition. This system elevates strategic foresight from an empirical art relying on personal talent to an axiomatic science grounded in cosmic laws, providing a new cognitive framework for human civilization to identify key nodes and formulate long-term strategies amid complex uncertainties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Changwu(昶梧) Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: