Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Establishes LP's formal structure and uniqueness in persistence theories, indicating its completeness.
This paper establishes the formal structure of La Profilée. Reading P000 — the canonical derivation — against the requirements of formal axiomatics reveals a precise result: LP has one genuine primitive (the definition of state as minimal distinguishability) and one genuine axiom (real transformation). Everything else — M1, M3, F/M/K, IR ≤ 1, structural time, and the regime architecture — is derived. M1 is a theorem, not an axiom. M3 is a theorem, not an axiom. From these two starting points the paper derives the complete LP structure in formal notation, constructs the minimal model proving consistency, and proves the Uniqueness Theorem: any globally coherent persistence theory that admits real transformation and non-trivial states is LP-equivalent. The formal structure of LP is therefore closed. This paper does not replace P000. It translates P000's derivation into a formal language and closes the gaps that informal derivation leaves open: it proves the two primitives are genuinely minimal, proves consistency by explicit model construction, and proves uniqueness by exhaustion over all possible structural alternatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marc Maibom (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: