The paper examines the effect of aid on poverty, rather than on economic growth. We devise a ‘pro‐poor (public) expenditure index’, and present evidence that, together with inequality and corruption, this is a key determinant of the aid’s poverty leverage. After presenting empirical evidence which suggests a positive leverage of aid donors on pro‐poor expenditure, we argue for the development of conditionality in a new form, which gives greater flexibility to donors in punishing slippage on previous commitments, and keys aid disbursements to performance in respect of policy variables which governments can influence in a pro‐poor direction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mosley et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: