Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Forty-three patients with liver metastases were imaged using 14 different pulse sequences (average, 7.5 sequences per patient) to allow direct comparison of their performance. "T2-weighted" spin-echo (SE) images, "T1-weighted" inversion recovery (IR) images, and "T1-weighted" SE images were obtained using a wide range of timing parameters. Pulse sequence performance was quantitated by measuring liver signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios and cancer-liver signal difference-to-noise (SD/N) ratios. Data were standardized to reflect a constant imaging time of 9 minutes for all pulse sequences. The SE 2,000/120 (TR [repetition time]/TE [echo time]) sequence resulted in the greatest SD/N ratio of the T2-weighted SE sequences but also yielded the low S/N ratios, poor anatomic resolution, and motion artifacts common to all T2-weighted SE images. IR sequence images were also sensitive to motion artifacts because of the use of a long TR (1,500 msec). Short TR/TE T1-weighted SE sequences (SE 260/18) had the greatest SD/N ratio (P less than .05), S/N ratio, and anatomic resolution. Furthermore, extensive signal averaging appears to be a powerful solution to all types of motion artifacts in the abdomen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stark et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: