OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of acute injuries and soccer-related chronic pain from long-term training and during matches in adolescent players using natural grass turfs (NT) and artificial turfs (AT). DESIGN: Case-controlled prospective study. SETTING: Institutional-level Fédération Internationale de Football Association Medical Centre of Excellence. PARTICIPANTS: Youth soccer players (12-17 years of age) from 6 teams, with a predominant tendency to train on either NT or AT, were included. Of 332 players enrolled in this study, 301 remained to completion. INTERVENTIONS: Medically diagnosed acute injuries and chronic pain were recorded daily by team health care staff throughout 2005, and reports were provided monthly to the authors. ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: Noninvasive prospective study. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Age and turf type. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Acute injuries per 1000 player hours on each surface and chronic complaints per 1000 player hours were evaluated according to frequency of surface used > or = 80% of the time. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) of acute injuries and chronic complaints during play on NT and AT was calculated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute injuries between the 2 surfaces during training and competition. However, the AT group showed a significantly higher incidence of low back pain during training (IRR, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.48). Early adolescence and prolonged training hours were factors associated with an increased incidence of chronic pain in the AT group. CONCLUSION: Adolescent players routinely training on AT for prolonged periods should be carefully monitored, even on AT conforming to new standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aoki et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: