Key result
Adding blood profiles to workload ML models improves injury prediction accuracy ~15%.
Why the study?
Predicting injuries using external workloads has moderate accuracy, so this study investigated whether blood sample profiles could enhance predictive models.
Does combining blood sample profiles with external workloads improve the prediction of non-contact injuries in elite soccer players?
Observational (n=18)
No
Does combining blood sample profiles with external workloads improve the prediction of non-contact injuries in elite soccer players?
Incorporating blood sample profiles alongside external workload data significantly improves the accuracy of machine learning models in forecasting non-contact injuries in elite soccer players.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid personalized injury prevention in elite soccer; leaves open prospective validation before practice adoption.
Purpose By analyzing external workloads with machine learning models (ML), it is now possible to predict injuries, but with a moderate accuracy. The increment of the prediction ability is nowadays mandatory to reduce the high number of false positives. The aim of this study was to investigate if players’ blood sample profiles could increase the predictive ability of the models trained only on external training workloads. Method Eighteen elite soccer players competing in Italian league (Serie B) during the seasons 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 took part in this study. Players’ blood samples parameters (i.e., Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, number of red blood cells, ferritin, and sideremia) were recorded through the two soccer seasons to group them into two main groups using a non-supervised ML algorithm (k-means). Additionally to external workloads data recorded every training or match day using a GPS device (K-GPS 10 Hz, K-Sport International, Italy), this grouping was used as a predictor for injury risk. The goodness of ML models trained were tested to assess the influence of blood sample profile to injury prediction. Results Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, number of red blood cells, testosterone, and ferritin were the most important features that allowed to profile players and to analyze the response to external workloads for each type of player profile. Players’ blood samples’ characteristics permitted to personalize the decision-making rules of the ML models based on external workloads reaching an accuracy of 63%. This approach increased the injury prediction ability of about 15% compared to models that take into consideration only training workloads’ features. The influence of each external workload varied in accordance with the players’ blood sample characteristics and the physiological demands of a specific period of the season. Conclusion Field experts should hence not only monitor the external workloads to assess the status of the players, but additional information derived from individuals’ characteristics permits to have a more complete overview of the players well-being. In this way, coaches could better personalize the training program maximizing the training effect and minimizing the injury risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossi et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Injury risk in elite soccer players (n=18). Machine learning model combining external workloads and blood sample profiles vs. Machine learning model using only external workloads was evaluated on Injury prediction accuracy (F1-score). Incorporating players' blood sample profiles into machine learning models based on external workloads increased injury prediction accuracy by 15% compared to models using only training workloads.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: