Seventy patients with previously untreated advanced Hodgkin's disease and without bulky disease were entered in a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing epirubicin in combination with vinblastine, bleomycin, and dacarbazine (EVBD) with a regimen containing mitoxantrone, vinblastine, bleomycin, and dacarbazine (MVBD). Both groups were comparable for the variables of age, sex, stage, and presence of B symptoms and histology. Thirty-one (88%) of EVBD-treated patients achieved a pathologically documented complete remission (CR) compared to the 24 cases (68%) of the MVBD-treated group. After a median follow-up of 36 months, duration of CR is better in the EVBD-treated patients with an actuarial 5-year duration of CR of 80%, statistically different to the MVBD group: 53% (P < 0.01). Both regimens showed the same gastrointestinal toxicity, but the patients treated with the MVBD regimen shown most and severe hematological and cardiac toxicities. Also, biochemical alterations in hepatic test were observed in these patients. The alternative use of epirubicin in combination chemotherapy appears to be as effective in advanced Hodgkin's disease without bulky disease, with reduced clinical toxicity. Mitoxantrone containing regimen was not found to have an equivalent efficacy and clinical toxicity was most frequent and severe. We felt that mitoxantrone could be consider a second-line drug in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Avilés et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: