Why the study?
DMD remains incurable, and recent studies suggest impaired angiogenesis and ischemia contribute to its pathogenesis, motivating an evaluation of vascular-targeted therapies.
Do vascular targeted therapies (NO or VEGF modulation) attenuate the dystrophic phenotype and enhance angiogenesis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy?
Do vascular targeted therapies (NO or VEGF modulation) attenuate the dystrophic phenotype and enhance angiogenesis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy?
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
deficiency leads to progressive fibrosis, myofiber damage, chronic inflammation, and dysfunction of the mitochondria and muscle stem cells. Currently, DMD is incurable, and treatment involves the administration of glucocorticoids in order to delay disease progression. In the presence of developmental delay, proximal weakness, and elevated serum creatine kinase levels, a definitive diagnosis can usually be made after an extensive review of the patient's history and physical examination, as well as confirmation through muscle biopsy or genetic testing. Current standards of care include the use of corticosteroids to prolong ambulation and delay the onset of secondary complications, including respiratory muscle and cardiac functions. However, different studies have been carried out to show the relationship between vascular density and impaired angiogenesis in the pathogenesis of DMD. Several recent studies on DMD management are vascular targeted and focused on ischemia as a culprit for the pathogenesis of DMD. This review critically discusses approaches-such as modulation of nitric oxide (NO) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-related pathways-to attenuate the dystrophic phenotype and enhance angiogenesis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vascular-targeted therapies, such as NO or VEGF modulation, represent a potential therapeutic approach to address ischemia and impaired angiogenesis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thapa et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: