The HeartHealth text message support program reduced the rate of all-cause health care utilization events (RR 0.91) compared to usual care in postdischarge cardiovascular patients.
Observational (n=11,542)
No
Does a text message support program reduce all-cause health care utilization events in cardiovascular patients postdischarge?
A 6-month text message support program significantly reduced all-cause health care utilization events in cardiovascular patients postdischarge, particularly in those over 65 years old.
Effect estimate: RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.83-0.99)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.43% vs 0.52%
p-value: p=0.033
BACKGROUND: The HeartHealth program is a text message support program for cardiovascular patients in Western Sydney, Australia. It comprised regular semipersonalized text messages providing cardiovascular disease information, advice, and support over a 6-month period. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the impact of the HeartHealth program on health care service utilization. METHODS: This is an observational study that compared hospitalization rates in patients who enrolled in the HeartHealth program to patients who did not. Patients ≥18 years old who attended cardiology clinics or were discharged from the cardiology unit at Westmead Hospital between April 2020 and April 2022 were invited to participate in HeartHealth. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of all-cause health care utilization events in the 6 months postdischarge. All analyses were adjusted for demographic and comorbidity variables. RESULTS: 11,542 patients were included in the analysis (intervention: 4,324, control: 7,218), with a mean age of 58.8 ± 17.0 years, and 60.7% (7,003/11,535) were male. HeartHealth participants had lower rates of health care service events compared to control participants (number of events per patient: 0.43 intervention vs 0.52 control; adjusted rate ratio RR: 0.91 95% CI: 0.83-0.99; P = 0.033). There was a greater reduction in health care utilization events in older (>65 years old) compared to younger patients (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72-0.93 vs RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.87-1.10, respectively; interaction P = 0.043). HeartHealth participants reported that the program improved diet, physical activity levels, and medication compliance. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates the potential of text message-based postdischarge support for cardiovascular disease patients to decrease their need for health care service utilization for all medical causes.
Sheahen et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Cardiovascular disease (n=11,542). HeartHealth program (text message support) vs. Usual care (no text messages) was evaluated on Incidence rate of all-cause health care utilization events (composite of ED presentations and/or hospital admissions) (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99, p=0.033). The HeartHealth text message support program reduced the rate of all-cause health care utilization events (RR 0.91) compared to usual care in postdischarge cardiovascular patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: