Let M₀ be a normal linear regression model and let M₁,⋯, MK be distinct proper linear submodels of M₀. Let k ∈ \0,⋯, K\ be a model selection rule based on observed data from the true model. Given k, let the unknown parameters of the selected model Mₖ be fitted by the maximum likelihood method. A loss function is introduced which depends additively on two parts: (i) a measure of the difference between the fitted model Mₖ and the true model; and (ii) a measure Cₖ of the "complexity" of the selected model. A natural model selection rule k̄, which minimizes an empirical version of this loss, is shown to be admissible and very nearly Bayes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charles J. Stone (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: