Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We constrain cosmological parameters using combined measurements of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in the correlation function of galaxies and Ly-α absorbers that together cover 0.1 < z < 2.4. The BAO position measurements alone -- without fixing the absolute sound horizon `standard ruler' length with cosmic microwave background (CMB) data -- constrain Ω_m = 0.303 +/- 0.040 (68 per cent confidence) for a flat Λ CDM model, and w = -1.06+0.33-0.32, Ω_m = 0.292+0.045-0.040 for a flat wCDM model. Adding other large-scale structure (LSS) clustering constraints -- correlation function shape, the Alcock-Paczynski test and growth rate information -- to the BAO considerably tightens constraints (Ω_m = 0.290 +/- 0.019, H_0 = 67.5 +/- 2.8 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹, σ_8 = 0.80 +/- 0.05 for Λ CDM, and w = -1.14 +/- 0.19 for wCDM). The LSS data mildly prefer a lower value of H_0, and a higher value of Ω_m, than local distance ladder and type IA supernovae (SNe) measurements, respectively. While tension in the combined CMB, SNe and distance ladder data appears to be relieved by allowing w < -1, this freedom introduces tension with the LSS σ_8 constraint from the growth rate of matter fluctuations. The combined constraint on w from CMB, BAO and LSS clustering for a flat wCDM model is w = -1.03 +/- 0.06.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Addison et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: