Objectives . The aim of this study was to further develop and refine the Exercise Motivations Inventory (EMI), a measure of individuals' reasons for exercising. Design . Confirmatory factor analytic procedures using LISREL were employed to test the hypothesized 14‐factor structure of the revised instrument (the EMI‐2) and the invariance of the factor structure across gender. Methods . Four hundred and twenty‐five civil servants completed the revised instrument. Analyses were conducted in three phases. Phase 1 involved detailed examination of the fit of the 14‐factors separately in order to detect and eliminate poor indicators. In Phase 2 each factor was paired with every other factor in order to detect and eliminate ambiguous items. In Phase 3 factors were grouped with conceptually related factors into five submodels and the fit and factorial invariance across gender of these submodels was tested. Results . Item elimination at Phases 1 and 2 led to the development of a set of internally consistent factors with strong indicators and good discriminant validity. Phase 3 gave further evidence for the convergent and discriminant validity of the items and factors and strong support for the invariance of the factor structure across gender. Conclusions . The EMI‐2 is a factorially valid means of assessing a broad range of exercise participation motives in adult males and females, applicable to both exercisers and non‐exercisers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markland et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:
More from British Journal of Health Psychology