Why the study?
Does an automatic FOAM-based contour-tracking procedure accurately measure brachial artery diameter compared to expert estimation for assessing endothelial function?
Does an automatic FOAM-based contour-tracking procedure accurately measure brachial artery diameter compared to expert estimation for assessing endothelial function?
An automatic, operator-independent ultrasound tracking procedure using FOAM was developed to assess endothelial function via real-time brachial artery diameter changes.
Hypothesis-generating for operator-independent endothelial function assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Endothelial dysfunction is a systemic marker of cardiovascular disease and it can predict the development of overt atherosclerosis. An ultrasound approach can be used to measure the endothelial function for non-invasive in-vivo applications. Endothelium-dependent relaxation can be assessed by continuously measuring the brachial artery diameter change in response to occlusion and re-flow. The main goal of this work is the development of an automatic and operator-independent procedure which is able to locate the walls and to record, in real-time, the diameter of the brachial artery. The localization procedure is based on the computation of the centre of mass of the first-order absolute moment (FOAM). Important features of this operator allow parallel and real-time implementation of the contour-tracking procedure on digital signal processor (DSP) architectures. Methods derived from the standard regularization theory are also used to cope with noise, and each wall is approximated with a straight line. The procedure was quantitatively assessed by computing the linear regression between the diameter estimated by the system and the diameter estimated by an expert.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paterni et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: