Why the study?
Few studies have focused on designing convolution filters for spatial and frequency domain EEG feature learning across different brain regions to recognize depression.
Does the SparNet convolutional neural network accurately distinguish between depressive patients and normal controls using EEG signals?
Does the SparNet convolutional neural network accurately distinguish between depressive patients and normal controls using EEG signals?
The proposed SparNet model effectively detects depression using EEG signals by combining spatial and frequency domain information.
Hypothesis-generating for EEG-based depression detection; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Depression affects many people around the world today and is considered a global problem. Electroencephalogram (EEG) measurement is an appropriate way to understand the underlying mechanisms of major depressive disorder (MDD) to distinguish depression from normal control. With the development of deep learning methods, many researchers have adopted deep learning models to improve the classification accuracy of depression recognition. However, there are few studies on designing convolution filters for spatial and frequency domain feature learning in different brain regions. In this study, SparNet, a convolutional neural network composed of five parallel convolutional filters and the SENet, is proposed to learn EEG space-frequency domain characteristics and distinguish between depressive and normal control. The model is trained and tested by the cross-validation method of subject division. The results show that SparNet achieves a sensitivity of 95.07%, a specificity of 93.66%, and an accuracy of 94.37% in classification. Therefore, our results can conclude that the proposed SparNet model is effective in detecting depression using EEG signals. It also indicates that the combination of spatial information and frequency domain information is an effective way to identify patients with depression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: