This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This paper examines the development and circulation of anti-trans discourse across distinct national contexts by comparing Denmark and Italy, which are two countries with diverging gender regimes where there has nonetheless been a clear rise in anti-trans mobilizations since the mid-2010s. To this purpose, the study draws on critical frame analysis of both movement-produced and institutional documents from the period 2013 to 2024. The results of this analysis show three overarching clusters of anti-trans discourse across both countries designated as, respectively, prevention, surveillance, and regulation; epistemic delegitimization; and cultural threat. These clusters indicate the presence of a shared transnational repertoire of anti-trans frames, which are locally translated and adapted into, for example, secular-liberal or moral-religious contexts. The article situates these findings within the growing research on the transnational diffusion of anti-gender policies and discourses, arguing that affective resonance provides a key factor in the successful adaptation of anti-trans frames into local contexts. Finally, we argue that it is particularly the differentiated convergence and thus the adaptability of anti-trans discourse which has made it so central to contemporary anti-gender movements.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lavizzari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: