PulseExploreJournal ClubTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2022Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineOpen Access

Long-Term Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

It was unclear whether beta-blocker treatment is advantageous in patients with stable CAD who underwent PCI.

Does long-term beta-blocker therapy reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease without prior myocardial infarction or heart failure who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention?

Population

78,380 stable CAD patients without current or prior MI or heart failure undergoing DES implantation

Comparison

Beta-blocker treatment vs no beta-blocker treatment

Design

Nationwide cohort study

Follow-up

5 years

Authors

SLSeung‐Jun LeeDCDong‐Woo ChoiCKChoongki Kim

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Beta-blockers were associated with higher MACE risk post-PCI in stable CAD without prior MI/HF; leaves open whether RCTs would confirm causality or no benefit.

Structured PICO

Does long-term beta-blocker therapy reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease without prior myocardial infarction or heart failure who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention?

P
Population
78,380 patients with stable coronary artery disease without current or prior history of myocardial infarction or heart failure who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation.
I
Intervention
Long-term beta-blocker maintenance therapy
C
Comparator
No beta-blocker treatment
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) composed of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization with heart failure at 5 yearscomposite

In patients with stable CAD without prior MI or HF undergoing PCI, long-term beta-blocker therapy was not associated with improved clinical outcomes and showed a slightly higher risk of MACE.

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a102f0a92676d5461fdae7bhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.878003
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share