Why the study?
Determinants of health and stroke risk in Métis People may differ from other groups, warranting examination of how psychosocial and lifestyle factors relate to cardiometabolic risk and whether sex moderates these associations.
Do psychosocial and lifestyle factors predict cardiometabolic risk in Métis adults, and does sex moderate this relationship?
Do psychosocial and lifestyle factors predict cardiometabolic risk in Métis adults, and does sex moderate this relationship?
Psychosocial determinants, particularly wellbeing, play a central role in Métis People's cardiometabolic risk, with effects differing by sex.
Psychosocial factors may shape cardiometabolic risk in Métis adults with sex differences; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Introduction Métis People, one Indigenous group in Canada, have distinct culture, identity, and experiences. The determinants of Métis People's health, including stroke risk, may differ from other groups. This study examined relationships between psychosocial and lifestyle factors with cardiometabolic risk, a stroke risk indicator, and the moderating role of sex among Métis adults living in Saskatchewan, Canada. Methods A community-based cross-sectional observation study was conducted with 70 Métis adults (39 ± 16 years; 66% female). Hierarchical multiple regression, moderated by sex, assessed psychosocial and lifestyle predictors of cardiometabolic risks (blood cholesterol, fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, blood pressure, and waist circumference). Results Psychosocial factors were significantly associated with cardiometabolic risk components. Psychological distress, adverse childhood experiences, age and sex explained 30% of the variance in average blood pressure, F (4, 65) = 6.997, p = 0.01. Well-being, discrimination experiences, age and sex significantly explained 27% of the variance in average blood pressure, F (4, 65) = 5.89, p = 0.04. Sex moderated relationships of wellbeing with glycosylated hemoglobin, F (6, 63) = 7.374, p = 0.02, R 2 = 0.414, with age (β = −0.497, p < 0.01), wellbeing (β = 0.593, p = 0.01), and wellbeing × sex (β = −0.53, p = 0.01) being significant predictors. Psychological distress moderated by sex also predicted total cholesterol. Lifestyle factors did not significantly predict cardiometabolic risk. Discussion Psychosocial determinants, particularly wellbeing, play a central role in Métis People's cardiometabolic risk, with effects differing by sex. This emphasized the need for Métis-specific, trauma, and sex-informed approaches to cardiovascular health promotion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: