Why the study?
Late enhancement CMR requires potentially harmful gadolinium-based contrast agents to determine myocardial infarction, whereas emerging myocardial strain research offers a potential alternative.
Does a hierarchical template matching-based circumferential strain algorithm accurately identify the location of myocardial infarction compared to late gadolinium enhancement CMR?
Does a hierarchical template matching-based circumferential strain algorithm accurately identify the location of myocardial infarction compared to late gadolinium enhancement CMR?
The proposed HTM-CS algorithmic method can accurately identify the location of infarcted LV segments without gadolinium contrast, potentially improving safety and reducing scan times.
Facilitates gadolinium-free MI localization; extends strain imaging validation to contrast-intolerant patients.
BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI; location and extent of infarction) can be determined by late enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, which requires the injection of a potentially harmful gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). Alternatively, emerging research in the area of myocardial strain has shown potential to identify MI using strain values. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the location of MI by developing an applied algorithmic method of circumferential strain (CS) values, which are derived through a novel hierarchical template matching (HTM) method. METHODS: HTM-based CS H-spread from end-diastole to end-systole was used to develop an applied method. Grid-tagging magnetic resonance imaging was used to calculate strain values in the left ventricular (LV) myocardium, followed by the 16-segment American Heart Association model. The data set was used with k-fold cross-validation to estimate the percentage reduction of H-spread among infarcted and noninfarcted LV segments. A total of 43 participants (38 MI and 5 healthy) who underwent CMR imaging were retrospectively selected. Infarcted segments detected by using this method were validated by comparison with late enhancement CMR, and the diagnostic performance of the applied algorithmic method was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve test. RESULTS: The H-spread of the CS was reduced in infarcted segments compared with noninfarcted segments of the LV. The reductions were 30% in basal segments, 30% in midventricular segments, and 20% in apical LV segments. The diagnostic accuracy of detection, using the reported method, was represented by area under the curve values, which were 0.85, 0.82, and 0.87 for basal, midventricular, and apical slices, respectively, demonstrating good agreement with the late-gadolinium enhancement-based detections. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed applied algorithmic method has the potential to accurately identify the location of infarcted LV segments without the administration of late-gadolinium enhancement. Such an approach adds the potential to safely identify MI, potentially reduce patient scanning time, and extend the utility of CMR in patients who are contraindicated for the use of GBCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhalodiya et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: