Key result
The ratio of the first to second peak of forward wave intensity (SDR) was significantly decreased in patients with reduced ejection fraction compared to controls (2.5 vs 4.41) and independently predicted ventricular impairment.
Why the study?
Can non-invasive pressure-derived parameters (SDR, ED) combined with ECG QRS-duration accurately detect severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in adults?
Case-Control (n=285)
No
Can non-invasive pressure-derived parameters (SDR, ED) combined with ECG QRS-duration accurately detect severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in adults?
Non-invasive pressure-derived parameters, specifically the wave intensity S to D ratio combined with ejection duration and QRS duration, can accurately detect severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
BACKGROUND: Systolic left ventricular function strongly influences the blood pressure waveform. Therefore, pressure-derived parameters might potentially be used as non-invasive, diagnostic markers of left ventricular impairment. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of pressure-based parameters in combination with electrocardiography (ECG) for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction defined as severely reduced ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Two populations, each comprising patients with reduced EF and pressure-matched controls, were included for the main analysis (51/102 patients) and model testing (44/88 patients). Central pressure was derived from radial readings and used to compute blood flow. Subsequently, pulse wave analysis and wave intensity analysis were performed and the ratio of the two peaks of forward intensity (SDR) was calculated as a novel index of ventricular function. SDR was significantly decreased in the reduced EF group (2.5 vs. 4.4, P<0.001), as was central pulse pressure, augmentation index and ejection duration (ED), while the QRS-duration was prolonged. SDR and ED were independent predictors of ventricular impairment and when combined with QRS in a simple decision tree, a reduced EF could be detected with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 80%. The independent power of ED, SDR and QRS to predict reduced EF was furthermore confirmed in the test population. CONCLUSION: The detection or indication of reduced ejection fraction from pressure-derived parameters seems feasible. These parameters could help to improve the quality of cardiovascular risk stratification or might be used in screening strategies in the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hametner et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (reduced ejection fraction) (n=285). Wave intensity analysis (S to D ratio) vs. Normal ejection fraction controls was evaluated on S to D ratio (SDR) (OR 0.385, 95% CI 0.268-0.551, p=<0.001). The ratio of the first to second peak of forward wave intensity (SDR) was significantly decreased in patients with reduced ejection fraction compared to controls (2.5 vs 4.41) and independently predicted ventricular impairment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: