Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Therapeutic games represent a promising and efficient format by which access to, and engagement with evidence-based content can be enhanced. RE Think Game is such an online CBT-based intervention which was tested to be efficient in addressing the youngers mental health needs. In the current study, we recruited 85 children from an urban school (51 girls, M age of 10.95, SD = 1.64) and were offered the RE Think Game to play each level for a period of 4 weeks. Using a stepped-down adaptive design approach, those participants who did not register a reliable change after playing the game were further instructed to use a CBT-based ecological momentary intervention app, called PsyPills, while the rest were instructed to continue with monitoring their affective state using an ecological momentary assessment app, called MoodWheel. Results showed that after the participants played the game, their levels of mental health symptoms and irrational beliefs have significantly improved ( d = 0.30, 95% CI 0.07, 0.53, and d = 0.27, 95% CI 0.04, 0.50, respectively). Participants who did not initially show reliable change achieved additional improvement over time and displayed outcomes comparable to those of early responders at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up. When examining potential moderators of intervention effects, the results suggested a consistent pattern: among participants with greater difficulties in attachment security, the game-based intervention combined with the PsyPills app appeared to be more effective. In conclusion, digital interventions can be used to enhance and tailor the intervention’s content based on children’s needs. • RE Think Game reduced children's mental health symptoms. • RE Think Game reduced children's irrational beliefs. • Children without reliable change improved after using PsyPills. • Post-test and 3-month outcomes matched those who improved earlier. • Effects were stronger in children with lower attachment security.
David et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: