In this commentary on Cornell's (this issue) description of his use of the body in his analytic work with two patients, I consider what is mutative in these treatments. I use this opportunity to briefly review the parallel history of somatic and psychoanalytic therapies. Although I believe bodily experience and nonverbal forms of communication are often foundational to both subjective and interpersonal experience, I raise several concerns regarding Cornell's specific style of integrating attention to somatic experience in the context of relational psychoanalysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sue A. Shapiro (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: