Why the study?
Does repeated percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty safely and successfully manage recurrent restenosis in patients after initial PTCA?
Does repeated percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty safely and successfully manage recurrent restenosis in patients after initial PTCA?
Repeated balloon angioplasty is a safe and effective management strategy for patients with recurrent restenosis after initial PTCA, achieving high long-term symptom-free rates.
May support repeated PTCA for recurrent restenosis; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm durability.
The records of 1162 consecutive patients undergoing their first percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty at a centre between March 1980 and June 1987 were reviewed. Initial angioplasty was successful in 1011 patients (87%). In 202 (20%) symptomatic restenosis developed. Of these, 196 were treated with redilatation; this was successful in 181 (92%). After a second dilatation, restenosis developed in 47 patients (26%). Of these, 41 (87%) were treated with a third angioplasty, with primary success in 38 (93%). A further restenosis developed in 13 of these 38 patients (34%). Eight patients were treated with a fourth angioplasty with restenosis in four (50%). Two of these four patients underwent a fifth angioplasty (with continuing success at long term follow up in both). Overall, 14 of the 47 (30%) patients who developed restenosis twice were eventually treated with coronary bypass surgery. Most patients (33), however, were treated only with repeated angioplasties. Of these 33 patients, 27 were treated with a third angioplasty, four with a fourth procedure, and two with a fifth. Twenty-nine (88%) were symptom free at a mean follow up of 28 (range 8 to 86) months. The combined success rate for a third, fourth, and fifth angioplasty was 94%. These data suggest that most patients with recurrent restenosis after angioplasty may be managed successfully and safely with repeated redilatations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glazier et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: