Why the study?
The study explored global myocardial work index (GWI) in relation to sex and increased BMI in middle-aged adults with overweight and obesity.
Does global myocardial work index differ by sex and is it associated with central arterial stiffness in middle-aged adults with overweight and obesity?
Does global myocardial work index differ by sex and is it associated with central arterial stiffness in middle-aged adults with overweight and obesity?
Higher global myocardial work index in women compared to men is primarily driven by increased left ventricular workload due to higher aortic augmentation pressure.
Higher GWI in women appears mediated by aortic augmentation pressure; hypothesis-generating for central stiffness effects on myocardial work in obesity.
We explored global myocardial work index (GWI), a novel measure of myocardial function that integrates left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic load, in relation to sex and increased body mass index (BMI). We used data from 467 individuals (61% women, average age 47 ± 9 years and BMI 31.2 kg/m2) without known cardiac disease. Central arterial function was analysed by applanation tonometry. GWI was calculated from global longitudinal strain (GLS) and post-echocardiography supine blood pressure (BP). Covariables of GWI were identified in linear regression analyses. Women had higher BMI, aortic augmentation pressure (12 ± 7 vs. 8 ± 6 mmHg), LV GLS (20.0 ± 2.8 vs. 18.8 ± 2.8%), and GWI (2126 ± 385 vs. 2047 ± 389 mmHg%) than men (all p < 0.05). In univariable analyses, higher GWI was associated with female sex, higher age, systolic BP, LV wall stress, LV ejection fraction, left atrial size, LV ejection time, and with lower waist circumference (all p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for these correlates, female sex remained independently associated with higher GWI (β = 0.13, p = 0.007). After additional adjustment for aortic augmentation pressure or central pulse pressure, this association became non-significant. In conclusion, the higher GWI in women compared to men was mainly explained by increased LV workload due to higher aortic augmentation pressure in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindseth et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: