Why the study?
Direct measurements of oxygen uptake and heart rate are the gold standard but have practical limitations, being expensive and requiring sophisticated laboratory equipment.
Are estimations of VO2 and HR via wearable devices and machine learning effective alternatives to direct measurements for monitoring cardiovascular fitness?
Are estimations of VO2 and HR via wearable devices and machine learning effective alternatives to direct measurements for monitoring cardiovascular fitness?
Machine learning and wearable devices offer efficient, low-cost alternatives to expensive direct measurement systems for estimating VO2 and HR during daily activities.
This study presents a systematic review on the methods used to acquire Oxygen uptake (VO2) and heart rate (HR) for monitoring cardiovascular fitness during daily activities. VO2 and HR play a significant role especially during daily activities such as walking, exercise, or housekeeping. Several studies have been undertaken in recent years to evaluate VO2 and HR in a variety of target populations, mainly in two divisions; Direct Measurements and Estimations. Direct measurements are considered as the gold standard for VO2 and HR measurements. However, despite its high level of accuracy, there are practical limitations associated with direct measurement systems. Direct measurements are expensive and sophisticated laboratory equipment is needed to measure VO2 and HR. On the other hand, estimations via wearable devices using mathematical equations or machine learning are more efficient and low-cost. Utilizing various sets of predictor variables and a variety of machine learning and statistical approaches, several types of measurement models have been formed, including the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Generalized Regression Neural Networks (GRNN), Radial Basis Function Networks (RBFN), multilayer perceptron regressor (MLR) and Decision Tree Forest (DTF). Several studies proves that machine learning is the future direction for estimating VO2 and HR for monitoring cardiovascular fitness during daily activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safari et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: