The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) presently uses a 40 ppbv background O 3 level as a baseline in its O 3 risk assessments. This background is defined as those concentrations that would exist in the absence of North American emissions. Lefohn et al. [2001] have argued that frequent occurrences of O 3 concentrations above 50–60 ppbv at remote northern U.S. sites in spring are of stratospheric origin, challenging the EPA background estimate and implying that the current O 3 standard (84 ppbv, 8‐hour average) may be unattainable. We show that a 3‐D global model of tropospheric chemistry reproduces much of the observed variability in U.S. surface O 3 concentrations, including the springtime high‐O 3 events, with only a minor stratospheric contribution (always <20 ppbv). We conclude that the previous interpretations of a stratospheric source for these events underestimated the role of regional and hemispheric pollution. While stratospheric intrusions might occasionally elevate surface O 3 at high‐altitude sites, our results indicate that these events are rare and would not compromise the O 3 air quality standard. We find that the O 3 background is generally 15–35 ppbv, with some incidences of 40–50 ppbv in the west in spring at high‐elevation sites (>2 km). It declines from spring to summer and further decreases during O 3 pollution episodes. The 40 ppbv background assumed by EPA thus actually underestimates the risk associated with O 3 during polluted conditions. A better definition would represent background as a function of season, altitude, and total surface O 3 concentration. Natural O 3 levels are typically 10–25 ppbv and never exceed 40 ppbv. International controls to reduce the hemispheric pollution background would facilitate compliance with an AOT40‐type standard (cumulative exposure to O 3 above 40 ppbv) in the United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiore et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: