Summary Myelofibrosis ( MF ) patients can present with a wide spectrum of disease characteristics. We analysed the consistency of ruxolitinib efficacy across patient subgroups in the CO ntrolled M yelo F ibrosis Study With OR al JAK Inhibitor T reatment ( COMFORT ‐I,) a double‐blind trial, where patients with intermediate‐2 or high‐risk MF were randomized to twice‐daily oral ruxolitinib ( n = 155) or placebo ( n = 154). Subgroups analysed included MF subtype (primary, post‐polycythaemia vera, post‐essential thrombocythaemia), age (≤65, > 65 years), I nternational P rognostic S coring S ystem risk group, baseline E astern C ooperative O ncology G roup performance status (0, 1, ≥2), JAK 2 V617F mutation (positive, negative), baseline haemoglobin level (≥100, <100 g/l), baseline platelet count (100–200 × 10 9 /l, >200 × 10 9 /l), baseline palpable spleen size (≤10, >10 cm), and baseline quartile of spleen volume and T otal S ymptom S core ( TSS ; Q1 = lowest, Q4 = highest). Mean percentage change from baseline to week 24 in spleen volume and TSS were calculated for ruxolitinib and placebo in each subgroup. Overall survival was estimated by K aplan– M eier method according to original randomization group. In ruxolitinib‐treated patients, reductions in spleen volume and TSS and evidence of improved survival relative to placebo across subgroups were consistent with those seen in the COMFORT ‐I population, confirming that ruxolitinib is an effective therapy for the spectrum of MF patients studied in COMFORT ‐I.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verstovšek et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: