This report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Double-Blind Refereeing was presented to the IMS Council in August 1992. It summarizes arguments for and against blinding referees to the identity of the authors and suggests an experiment to evaluate the process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cox et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: