Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We introduce a new algorithm for generating near G-optimal designs for second-order models over cuboidal regions. The algorithm involves the use of Brent's minimization algorithm with coordinate exchange to create designs for 2 to 5 factors. Designs created using this new method either match or exceed the G-efficiency of previously reported designs. We also introduce a new graphical tool, the variance ratio fraction of design space (VRFDS) plot, which is useful for easy comparison of the prediction variance for competing designs over a given region of interest. Using the VRFDS plot to compare G-optimal designs to I-optimal designs shows that the G-optimal designs have higher prediction variance over the vast majority of the design region. This suggests that, for many response surface studies, G-optimal designs may not be the best choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: