Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
for thicknesses from 1 to 20 atomic layers where strain, rotation, and tilt parameters are varied. Five convergence angles are explored which vary from conventional nano beam electron diffraction (6.35 mrad) to atomic resolution conditions (32.94 mrad). From this simulated PACBED library, we train regression CNNs to simultaneously predict the 2D strain tensor, in-plane rotation, and tilt of the sample. For different convergence angles and thicknesses, we study the prediction performance for each of the deformation parameters. We find that there is a trade-off between better prediction performance (small convergence angles) and probe size (large convergence angles). For smaller convergence angles like those used for conventional NBED conditions, the strain prediction error can be as low as 0.0003 %, while for larger convergence angles like those used for atomic resolution probes, the strain error increases to 0.001 - 0.003 %. The impressive prediction performance even for large convergence angles suggests that PACBED combined with CNNs is a feasible method for predicting deformation parameters using atomic resolution electron probes. Further, we conclude that the prediction can be difficult for monolayers, and suggest two remedies: excluding tilt from the predictions and performing nonlinear intensity rescaling of the training data. This work contributes to the optimal design of PACBED experiments for characterization of local crystal deformations and, therefore, to an improved understanding of how 2D vdW materials respond to imperfections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yankovich et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: