Although research at the crossroads of communication and social cognition recognizes the importance of thought to the message reception process, none to date has systematically tested how “thinking for listening” might influence the listening process. One reason for this lacuna is the lack of a valid scale capable of measuring the many conceptualizations people have about listening. Consequently, this article sets out to develop and provide validity evidence for a measure to assess individual conceptualizations of listening. In Studies 1 through 3, evidence is gathered for the construct and nomological validity of the Revised Listening Concepts Inventory (LCI-R), whereas Study 4 provides evidence that listening conceptualizations vary across four listening situations. The general discussion argues for the importance of studying message reception processes as they occur in interaction and the role the LCI-R can play in helping to advance the theory building and practice of listening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham D. Bodie (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: