PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1976American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content241 citations

Effects of angiotensin, vasopressin, and methoxamine on cardiac function and blood flow distribution in conscious dogs

View Full Paper
GHGr. HeyndrickxUniversité Paris CitéDBD. H. BoettcherHarvard University PressSVS. F. VatnerRutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the cardiovascular effects of vasopressin, methoxamine, and angiotensin II in intact conscious dogs.
  • Intact conscious dogs were used to measure the effects of vasopressin, methoxamine, and angiotensin II on cardiac dynamics and blood flow distribution.

Structured PICO

Do vasopressin, methoxamine, and angiotensin II differentially affect cardiac function and regional blood flow distribution in conscious dogs?

P
Population
Intact, conscious dogs
I
Intervention
Vasopressin (ADH), methoxamine (MX), and angiotensin II (AN)
C
Comparator
Comparison among the three agents at an equal percent pressure elevation
O
Outcome
Coronary and left ventricular dynamics, cardiac output, and regional blood flow distributionsurrogate

Vasopressin, methoxamine, and angiotensin II exert potent yet differential vasoconstricting actions on peripheral beds and coronary vascular resistance in conscious dogs, largely due to differences in chronotropic and inotropic actions.

Abstract

A comparison was made of the effects of vasopressin (ADH), methoxamine (MX), and angiotensin II (AN) on coronary and left ventricular dynamics, cardiac output, and regional blood flow distribution in intact, consci9us dogs. At an equal percent pressure elevation, ADH reduced cardiac output and cardiac rate the most, while AN had the least effect. After denervation of arterial baroreceptors, ADH still reduced heart rate, while AN increased it, suggesting nonbaroreceptor negative and positive chronotropic effects, respectively. A differential pattern on peak dP/dt was also observed, with ACH causing a greater reduction than MX while AN did not decrease dP/dt. With heart rate held constant, AN did not reduce dP/dt, suggesting a direct positive inotropic effect since dP/dt should have fallen slightly due to reflex mechanisms, as was observed with MX and ADH. ADH induced the greatest increase in coronary resistance (140%), while the least (46%) was observed with AN, which could be explained, in part, by the differential effects observed on cardiac rate and contractility. The greatest increase in resistance in the iliac bed occurred with ADH (30%), and the least with AN (34%). Conversely, the greatest constriction in the renal bed occurred with AN (95%), and lesser amounts were observed with ADH (36%) and MX (35%). Thus ADH, MX, and AN exert potent yet differential vasoconstricting actions on peripheral beds. In addition, while all three agents elicited coronary vasoconstriction, the differential effects on coronary vascular resistance appeared to be due predominantly to a difference in chronotropic and inotropic actions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heyndrickx et al. (1976) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a105a70d91177df95fca78ehttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1976.231.5.1579
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Coronary and Myocardial Actions of Angiotensin1964 · 100 citations
  2. 2Cardiac Actions of Methoxamine1961 · 81 citations
  3. 3Cardioaccelerator action of angiotensin1962 · 63 citations
  4. 4Extent of Carotid Sinus Regulation of the Myocardial Contractile State in Conscious Dogs1972 · 82 citations
  5. 5Nature of the Inotropic Action of Angiotensin on Ventricular Myocardium1965 · 154 citations