Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The case for government involvement in the provision of elementary education in nineteenth-century England is assessed by presenting estimates of the rate of return to literacy. Before government involvement, the estimated rate of return to male literacy was considerably above the return on most alternative investments in the English economy. The differential narrowed with the onset of government involvement. The evidence is much weaker for any initial underinvestment in female literacy. The contribution to national income from correcting any initial underinvestment in literacy appears to have been modest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Mitch (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: