No AccessJournal of Speech and Hearing ResearchResearch Article1 Mar 1974Effects of Angle, Distance, and Illumination on Visual Reception of Speech by Profoundly Deaf Children Norman P. Erber Norman P. Erber Central Institute for the Deaf, St. Louis, Missouri Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1701.99 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Two adult females presented lists of 240 common nouns to small groups of profoundly deaf children (N = 3 to 6). Lipreading performance was measured under several conditions of speaker angle, light-incidence angle, illumination, and distance. The best visual word-recognition scores were obtained for 0 or 45° horizontal observation angles. Mean scores were 14 to 22% lower when the angle was increased to 90°. For viewing angles within the range of 0 to 45°, the smaller the distance between the speaker and the lipreader, the greater was the visual intelligibility. Minor variations in vertical viewing angle (−30 to +30°) had little effect on lipreading performance. Within the 0 to 45° range of horizontal viewing angles, illumination conditions which shadowed the speaker's oral cavity (overhead lighting) lowered mean lipreading performance 3 to 12% below that which was obtained for 0 or +45° angles of light incidence. With frontal illumination of the speaker, a large reduction in facial luminance (from 30 to 0.03 footlamberts) produced only a 13% decrement in visual intelligibility. Under conditions of high background brightness, however, a reduction in facial luminance from 30 to 3 footlamberts produced a mean decrement of 41%. The data suggest that visual communication in classrooms for deaf children can be enhanced easily by positioning teachers so that they face the windows as they speak and by compressing the pattern of pupils' desks so that all children can observe their teacher from favorable angles. Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Building and Environment209 (108655)1 Feb 2022The influence mechanism of daylight visual evaluation in college classrooms under visual field physiological characteristics of student group: Case studyGang Liu, Guanhua Qu, Lei Ren, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xingyu Zang and Rui Dang Ear & Hearing41:4 (825-837)1 Jul 202027 Sep 2019Modality Effects on Lexical Encoding and Memory Representations of Spoken WordsLynn M. Bielski, Lindsey Byom, Philip F. Seitz and Ken W. Grant Research in Developmental Disabilities34:5 (1781-1793)1 May 2013The development of word recognition, sentence comprehension, word spelling, and vocabulary in children with deafness: A longitudinal studyS. Colin, J. Leybaert, J. Ecalle and A. Magnan International Journal of Humanoid Robotics10:01 (1350005)1 Mar 2013THE FURHAT BACK-PROJECTED HUMANOID HEAD–LIP READING, GAZE AND MULTI-PARTY INTERACTIONSAMER AL MOUBAYED, GABRIEL SKANTZE and JONAS BESKOW Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique57:1 (109-132)1 Mar 2012Anticipation labiale et perception visuelleJohanna-Pascale Roy Samer Al Moubayed, Gabriel Skantze and Jonas Beskow (2012) Lip-Reading: Furhat Audio Visual Intelligibility of a Back Projected Animated Face Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_20 Des Power and Greg Leigh (2012) Curriculum: Cultural and Communicative Contexts The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, Volume 1, Second Edition10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199750986.013.0004 Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research53:6 (1529-1542)1 Dec 2010Lip Movement Exaggerations During Infant-Directed SpeechJordan R. Green, Ignatius S. B. Nip, Erin M. Wilson, Antje S. Mefferd and Yana Yunusova Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics72:1 (209-225)1 Jan 2010The temporal distribution of information in audiovisual spoken-word identificationAlexandra Jesse and Dominic W. Massaro Chemosensory Perception1:2 (92-94)1 Jun 2008Multi-modal Sensory Integration: Evaluating Foods and MatesPaul A. S. Breslin Journal of Phonetics36:2 (219-238)1 Apr 2008Facial expression and prosodic prominence: Effects of modality and facial areaMarc Swerts and Emiel Krahmer Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)73:632 (2085-2089)THE CONVERSATON SPACE BETWEEN 3 SITTING SIGNERS, AND STUDY ON POSITION OF SIGNERSYuichiro SUGIYAMA and Naoji MATSUMOTO G. Guillarm (2008) Boucle Audiophonologique. Contrôle Audiophonatoire, Prosodie, Lecture Labiale Précis d'audioprothèse10.1016/B978-2-294-06342-8.50006-9 Perceptual and Motor Skills105:3 (988-996)1 Dec 2007Comparison of Speechreading Training RegimensJudith T. Blumsack, Carolyn R. Bower and Margaret E. Ross Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)72:622 (77-82)STUDY ON CONVERSATION SPACE OF SIGN LANGUAGE SIGNERSYuichiro SUGIYAMA and Naoji MATSUMOTO Perceptual and Motor Skills105:7 (988)COMPARISON OF SPEECHREADING TRAINING REGIMENSJUDITH T. BLUMSACK Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research49:3 (628-635)1 Jun 2006Evaluation of an Audiovisual-FM System: Investigating the Interaction Between Illumination Level and a Talker's Skin Color on Speech-Reading PerformanceJean-Pierre Gagné, Ariane Laplante-Lévesque, Maude Labelle, Katrine Doucet and Marie-Christine Potvin International Journal of Audiology45:5 (295-300)1 Jan 2006Evaluation of an audiovisual-FM system: Speechreading performance as a function of distanceJean-Pierre Gagné, Monique Charest, K. Le Monday and C. Desbiens The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A57:3 (385-417)1 Apr 2004Orthographic structure and deaf spelling errors: Syllables, letter frequency, and speechAndrew C. Olson and Alfonso Caramazza Speech Communication37:3-4 (213-230)1 Jul 2002Auditory, visual and audiovisual clear speechJean-Pierre Gagné, Anne-Josée Rochette and Monique Charest Ear and Hearing22:3 (236-251)1 Jun 2001Use of Audiovisual Information in Speech Perception by Prelingually Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants: A First ReportLorin Lachs, David B. Pisoni and Karen Iler Kirk The Hearing Journal54:1 (48-51)1 Jan 2001Audiovisual-FM system is found more beneficial in classroom than auditory-onlyJean-Pierre Gagné Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27:6 (1386-1403)Effects of horizontal viewing angle on visual and audiovisual speech recognition.Timothy R. Jordan and Sharon M. Thomas Language and Speech43:1 (107-124)1 Mar 2000Effects of Distance on Visual and Audiovisual Speech RecognitionTimothy R. Jordan and Paul Sergeant Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics14:4 (243-253)1 Jan 2000The effect of stimulus structure on the auditory-visual perception of speech by Hebrew speaking adults with profound hearing loss Tova Most, Limor Adi-Bensaid, Moe B Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research41:3 (564-575)1 Jun 1998Selective Visual Masking in SpeechreadingJill E. Preminger, Hwei-Bing Lin, Michel Payen and Harry Levitt Christopher S. Campbell and Dominic W. Massaro (1998) Visible Speech Perception and Robustness in Face Processing Face Recognition10.1007/978-3-642-72201-1_20 European Journal of Psychology of Education12:4 (449-464)1 Dec 1997Multisensory and unisensory approaches to communicating with deaf childrenDesmond John Power and Mervyn Bruce Hyde Perception & Psychophysics59:4 (580-592)1 Jun 1997Limited visual control of the intelligibility of speech in face-to-face dialogueA. H. Anderson, E. G. Bard, C. Sotillo, A. Newlands and G. Doherty-Sneddon Perception26:5 (627-644)1 May 1997Perception of Visible Speech: Influence of Spatial QuantizationChristopher S Campbell and Dominic W Massaro T. Jordan, P. Sergeant, C. Martin, S. Thomas and E. Thow Effects of horizontal viewing angle on visual and audiovisual speech perception 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation10.1109/ICSMC.1997.6382350-7803-4053-1 American Journal of Audiology4:3 (67-70)1 Nov 1995Analysis of View Angle Used in Speechreading Training of SentencesSara L. Bauman and Georgia HambrechtJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research35:2 (466-471)1 Apr 1992Speechreading Performance Under Different Conditions of Video Image, Repetition, and Speech RateFrans J. IJsseldijk Scandinavian Journal of Psychology32:1 (9-17)1 Mar 1991Visual speech processing: Word-decoding and word-discrimination related to sentence-based speechreading and hearing-impairmentBJÖRN LYXELL and JERKER RÖNNBERG Ruth Campbell (1989) LIPREADING Handbook of Research on Face Processing10.1016/B978-0-444-87143-5.50016-0 Perceptual and Motor Skills66:2 (415-418)1 Apr 1988Effects of Training and Visual Distance on Speechreading PerformanceLarry H. Small and Alicia A. Infante Jerker Rönnberg and Björn Lyxell (1986) Compensatory Strategies in Speechreading 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61195-4 Journal of Communication Disorders18:5 (373-381)1 Oct 1985Facial hair as a factor in speechreading performanceYoko Kitano, Bruce M. Siegenthaler and Richard G. Stoker Quentin Summerfield (1983) Audio-visual Speech Perception, Lipreading and Artificial Stimulation Hearing Science and Hearing Disorders10.1016/B978-0-12-460440-7.50010-7 Volume 17Issue 1March 1974Pages: 99-112 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Feb 28, 1973Accepted: Nov 19, 1973 Published in issue: Mar 1, 1974PubMed ID: 4828368 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1974 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norman P. Erber (1974) studied this question.