Why the study?
STEMI patients show altered intracardiac blood flow compared to controls, but how 4D flow parameters change over time has not been previously explored.
Do longitudinal changes in left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy measured by 4D flow CMR post-STEMI differ between patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction?
Do longitudinal changes in left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy measured by 4D flow CMR post-STEMI differ between patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction?
Serial 4D flow CMR reveals that persistently lower peak E-wave kinetic energy in patients with reduced EF post-STEMI suggests early and fixed impairment in diastolic function.
Persistently lower E-wave KE in rEF post-STEMI supports early fixed diastolic impairment; leaves open 4D flow CMR utility beyond EF for risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiac magnetic resonance (cardiac MR) imaging provides quantification of intracavity left ventricular (LV) flow kinetic energy (KE) parameters in three dimensions. ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients have been shown to have altered intracardiac blood flow compared to controls; however, how 4D flow parameters change over time has not been explored previously. PURPOSE: Measure longitudinal changes in intraventricular flow post-STEMI and ascertain its predictive relevance of long-term cardiac remodeling. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Thirty-five STEMI patients (M:F = 26:9, aged 56 ± 9 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3 T/3D EPI-based, fast field echo (FFE) free-breathing 4D-flow sequence with retrospective cardiac gating. ASSESSMENT: Serial imaging at 3-7 days (V1), 3-months (V2), and 12-months (V3) post-STEMI, including the following protocol: functional imaging for measuring volumes and 4D-flow for calculating parameters including systolic and peakE-wave LVKE, normalized to end-diastolic volume (iEDV) and stroke volume (iSV). Data were analyzed by H.B. (3 years experience). Patients were categorized into two groups: preserved ejection fraction (pEF, if EF > 50%) and reduced EF (rEF, if EF < 50%). STATISTICAL TESTS: Independent sample t-tests were used to detect the statistical significance between any two cohorts. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: than rEF patients throughout the study (V1: 25.4 ± 11.6 μJ/mL vs. 18.1 ± 9.9 μJ/mL, P < 0.03, V2: 24.0 ± 10.2 μJ/mL vs. 17.2 ± 12.2 μJ/mL, P < 0.05, V3: 27.7 ± 14.8 μJ/mL vs. 15.8 ± 7.6 μJ/mL, P < 0.04). DATA CONCLUSION: Systolic KE increased acutely following MI; in patients with pEF, this decreased over 12 months, while patients with rEF, this remained raised. Compared to patients with pEF, persistently lower peakE-wave KE in rEF patients is suggestive of early and fixed impairment in diastolic function. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ben‐Arzi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: