Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AbstractThis exploratory computer assisted-language learning (CALL) study used a computer-mediated communication (CMC) interface to allow English as a foreign language (EFL) writing students in classes at two universities to give each other anonymous peer feedback about essay-writing assignments reacting to selected news stories. Experts also provided feedback review. Follow-up questions were facilitated by the interface. The students felt that they benefitted from the instructional design, but found that the peer review focused most on things like grammar whereas the experts focused on organization and structure, making the expert feedback more valuable. Researchers found that more complex issues discussed in the source news articles resulted in lower outcome scores, based on a rubric, than did source material simpler issues. The study also compared performance of students with higher and lower ability and evaluated the quality of the review comments. Conclusions and recommendations for practice are provided. This study is significant because it used CALL/CMC technology to provide online interactivity between students and reviewers in an open forum that allowed students to seek follow-up clarification to the comments of reviewers. The review process, therefore, was not a one-way anonymous communication from reviewer to student but rather allowed interactive discussion of the points and suggestions made by the reviewers.Keywords: peer reviewexpert reviewdiscussion forumCMCEFL writing revision Additional informationFundingThis research was partially supported by the National Science Council in Taiwan grant number NSC 102-2511-S-126 -005.Notes on contributorsWen-Chi Vivian WuWen-Chi Vivian Wu is a professor of the Department of English Language and the director of the CALL R&D Center at Providence University in Taiwan. Her recent research areas include CALL, MALL, cross-cultural communication, robotics learning, and learner motivation for English as a global language. She has published extensively on CALL and technology-related prestigious journals, including CALL and System, among others. Over the past few years, she has integrated international experiences into her conversation and writing courses linking her students with college students and university professors in the USA.Emily PetitEmily Petit is a graduate student of Wen-Chi Vivian Wu at Providence University, Taichung, Taiwan. Ching-Huei ChenChing-Huei Chen, PhD, is an associate professor at the Department of Industrial Education and Technology, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan, R.O.C. Her scholarly interests include design and development of technology-enhanced learning environments, computer-supported collaborative learning, motivation to learn, problem-solving, and professional development. She can be reached at chhchen@cc.ncue.edu.tw.
Wu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: