OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity of three recently developed questionnaires to mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI)-related effects. DESIGN: Comparison of an MTBI group, within 3 weeks of injury, to a normal control group. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic. SUBJECTS: 120 MTBI patients and 120 age, education, sex, and preinjury socioeconomic status-matched normal control subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Problem Checklist (PCL) from the New York Head Injury Family Interview to assess MTBI symptoms, the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) to assess functional burden associated with health problems, and the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) to assess home, social, and productive activities. RESULTS: Patients' self-ratings on the PCL and SF-36, but not the CIQ, were generally worse than those of the normal controls. The largest differences were obtained on SF-36 measures that appear to assess musculoskeletal injury effects. CONCLUSIONS: The PCL and SF-36 show promise as sensitive measures of MTBI-related effects. The SF-36 may be particularly useful in evaluating associated musculoskeletal injuries, which might otherwise be overlooked by MTBI health care providers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paniak et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: