AIM: To present an evaluative audit assessing the effectiveness of clinical supervision for ward managers. BACKGROUND: A year-long project to introduce clinical supervision to ward managers was implemented and evaluated. The objectives were to evaluate staff perceptions of implementing clinical supervision and determine its outcomes. METHOD: An audit evaluation process was used. RESULTS: Findings are presented against perceptions, implementation and reported outcomes of clinical supervision. Insights were gained into its relevance and importance to nurses and the organisation. Findings show that clinical supervision was perceived to be effective and helped improve patient care, but some feared it becoming a form of managerial control. CONCLUSIONS: Ward managers perceived advantages for personal and professional development from adopting this process. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: There is a need for greater understanding of clinical supervision before Trusts implement it. The introduction of a resource pack for clinical areas would also be of value. Finally, there needs to be a named person who has a special knowledge of clinical supervision to act as a champion and change agent in effecting implementation at both the executive level and within each clinical area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: