A negotiation model for thinking about controversial issues in psychology is presented. Based on the method described in Fisher and Ury's (1991) book, Getting to “Yes,” the model gives students a framework for managing conflicts, including conflicting positions on controversial issues. I describe how role-playing and simulations are used with the model. Relations between the negotiation model and two other models of critical thinking are examined briefly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Bernstein (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: