Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We investigate (1) whether the variation in accounting standards across national boundaries relative to International Accounting Standards (IAS) has an impact on the ability of financial analysts to forecast non‐U.S. firms’ earnings accurately, and (2) whether analyst forecast accuracy changes after firms adopt IAS. IAS are a set of financial reporting policies that typically require increased disclosure and restrict management’s choices of measurement methods relative to the accounting standards of our sample firms’ countries of domicile. We develop indexes of differences in countries’ accounting disclosure and measurement policies relative to IAS, and document that greater differences in accounting standards relative to IAS are significantly and positively associated with the absolute value of analyst earnings forecast errors. Further, we show that analyst forecast accuracy improves after firms adopt IAS. More specifically, after controlling for changes in the market value of equity, changes in analyst following, and changes in the number of news reports, we find that the convergence in firms’ accounting policies brought about by adopting IAS is positively associated with the reduction in analyst forecast errors.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hollis Ashbaugh
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Morton Pincus
University of California, Irvine
Journal of Accounting Research
University of Wisconsin–Madison
University of Iowa
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ashbaugh et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a107cd6d91177df95fcc913 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.00020
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: