Why the study?
The study was designed to determine the relationship between muscular strength and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in young women.
Does higher relative handgrip strength associate with lower carotid intima-media and extra-media thickness in young women?
Does higher relative handgrip strength associate with lower carotid intima-media and extra-media thickness in young women?
Higher muscular strength is associated with reduced subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in young women, independent of physical activity levels.
Hypothesis-generating for strength interventions on carotid atherosclerosis in young women; prospective studies needed before practice change.
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between strength and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in young women. Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and extra-media thickness (EMT) were used as measures of subclinical atherosclerosis and CVD risk. Muscular strength, IMT, and EMT were measured in 70 young women (mean age=21±4 years). Strength was determined using a handgrip dynamometer and expressed relative to body mass. IMT and EMT were measured using ultrasonography of the left common carotid artery. Objectively measured moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was assessed with accelerometry. Higher relative handgrip strength was associated with lower IMT (r=-0.23; p<0.05) and lower EMT (r=-0.27; p<0.05). Associations between relative handgrip strength and IMT (r=-0.24) as well as EMT (r=-0.25) remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders including traditional CVD risk factors and MVPA (p<0.05). These results show that there is an inverse association between handgrip strength with carotid IMT and EMT in young women. Muscular strength may reduce CVD risk in young women via favorable effects on subclinical carotid atherosclerosis independent of physical activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karabinus et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: