Reliability Assessment of Two Militarily Relevant Occupational Physical Performance Tests

To determine the number of test sessions needed to stabilize performance on two military occupational physical tests and to assess their reliability, 10 male soldiers (22 +/- 3 yrs, 183 +/- 7 cm, 87 +/- 8 kg) performed both an indoor 6-station obstacle course (OC) and a repetitive box-lifting task (RBLT). The OC consisted of 46 cm-high hurdles, zigzag sprint, low crawl, horizontal pipe shimmy, 1.4 m wall traversal, and straight sprint. The RBLT required subjects to lift 20.5 kg boxes, continuously for 10 minutes, from the ground onto 1.3 m high platforms positioned 2.4 m apart. The OC mean +/- SD times (s), for sessions 1-4 respectively, were 37.4 +/- 2.2, 35.8 +/- 2.5, 34.7 +/- 2.1, and 34.5 +/- 1.7 seconds. The number of boxes lifted was 177 +/- 31, 194 +/- 28, 189 +/- 32, and 186 +/- 37 for the RBLT. Performance stabilized on the 3rd session for the OC (7% improvement over first trial, p < 0.05) and on the 2nd session for the RBLT (9% improvement over first trial, p < 0.05). The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.92 and 0.94 for the OC and RBLT, respectively. This study demonstrates that both are reliable tests, but they do require administration of 1 single-trial session of RBLT and 2 two-trial sessions of OC before highly reliable performance data are obtained.