We use ∼88 arcmin2 of deep (≳26.5 mag at 5σ) NICMOS data over the two GOODS fields and the HDF-South to conduct a search for bright z ≳ 7 galaxy candidates. This search takes advantage of an efficient preselection over 58 arcmin2 of NICMOS H160-band data where only plausible z ≳ 7 candidates are followed up with NICMOS J 110-band observations. ∼248 arcmin2 of deep ground-based near-infrared data (≳25.5 mag, 5σ) are also considered in the search. In total, we report 15z850-dropout candidates over this area - 7 of which are new to these search fields. Two possible z ∼ 9 J110-dropout candidates are also found, but seem unlikely to correspond to z ∼ 9 galaxies (given the estimated contamination levels). The present z ∼ 9 search is used to set upper limits on the prevalence of such sources. Rigorous testing is undertaken to establish the level of contamination of our selections by photometric scatter, low-mass stars, supernovae, and spurious sources. The estimated contamination rate of our z ∼ 7 selection is ∼24%. Through careful simulations, the effective volume available to our z ≳ 7 selections is estimated and used to establish constraints on the volume density of luminous (Lz=3*, or ∼-21 mag) galaxies from these searches.We find that the volume density of luminous star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 7 is 13-5+8 times lower than at z ∼ 4 and >25 times lower (1σ) at z ∼ 9 than at z ∼ 4. This is the most stringent constraint yet available on the volume density of ≳Lz=3*galaxies at z ∼ 9. The present wide-area, multi-field search limits cosmic variance to ≲20%. The evolution we find at the bright end of theUVLF is similar to that found from recent Subaru Suprime-Cam,HAWK-I or ERS WFC3/IR searches. The present paper also includes a complete summary of our final z ∼ 7 z850-dropout sample (18 candidates) identified from all NICMOS observations to date (over the two GOODS fields, the HUDF, galaxy clusters).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouwens et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: