Present-day debates on science are polarised between two official anti-theses. The respective competing positions can be read as a radicalisation of postmodern relativism in the direction of a post-truth framework, and defences of facticity based on the assumption of the abstract neutrality of objective facts. These two epistemological positions are only apparently independent from each other. Post-truth epistemology and facticity have complementary ideological functions despite their apparent contradictions: both exclude the possibility to address and transform the societal framework in which they are inserted. A critical theory – more precisely, a Marxist political epistemology – is necessary to address and to comprehend the ideological role of today’s epistemological dichotomies. These dichotomies jointly monopolise the cultural arena and hinder emancipatory imagination, thought and action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meisner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: