PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1970Journal of the American Statistical Association183 citations

Balanced Repeated Replications for Standard Errors

View Full Paper
LKLeslie KishMFMartin R. Frankel

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate balanced repeated replications (BRR) for estimating standard errors in statistics involving complex samples.
  • Utilized balanced repeated replications to compute standard errors for regression coefficients across multivariate techniques.
  • The study measured variances using half-samples derived from primary selections in various strata.
  • Analyzed data from five empirical studies to assess standard errors relative to simple random sampling.
  • Average ratios of actual standard errors to those of simple random sampling exceeded 1.00 across all studies.
  • Ratios ranged from 1.05 for less clustered samples to 1.46 for more clustered samples.
  • Findings suggest BRR enhances precision in the estimation of errors, especially for nonlinear statistics.

Abstract

Abstract Balanced repeated replications (BRR) is a general method for computing standard errors. It is useful when mathematical distribution theory is impractical or lacking, and especially for analytical statistics based on complex samples where clustering destroys the independence of observations. Presented are results of methods used to measure standard errors of regression coefficients for several multivariate techniques. The basic designs of the several samples comprised two primary selections (PS) per stratum. Each replication was a half-sample, created by selecting one PS from each stratum. The variance of the coefficient , estimated from the entire sample, is measured by , where bj is the same estimator based on a half-sample. To increase the precision of the variance estimate, select k repeated replications and obtain the mean of the k computed variances, . Balanced repeated replications reduce the number of repetitions needed; e.g., 48 balanced replications sufficed for 47 strata in our samples. Though proofs are complete only for linear statistics, rationale and results are offered to indicate that BRR provides needed estimates of errors for nonlinear statistics. The ratios, , of actual standard errors to those of simple random sampling, (srs), are investigated for several statistics in five empirical studies. In each study the average values of exceed 1.00 and range from 1.05 for less clustered to 1.46 for more clustered samples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kish et al. (1970) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a108a3f4fb650da4fff9dbfhttps://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1970.10481145
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper