Why the study?
Does the mode of muscle hypertrophy (compensatory vs. work-induced) affect the cytological characteristics and organelle volume densities in rat muscle cells?
Does the mode of muscle hypertrophy (compensatory vs. work-induced) affect the cytological characteristics and organelle volume densities in rat muscle cells?
Compensatory and work-induced muscle hypertrophy in rats result in distinct cytological adaptations, with compensatory hypertrophy driven by mitochondrial volume increase and work-induced hypertrophy by proportional organelle increases.
Mode-specific organelle changes in rat hypertrophy models are hypothesis-generating; human studies needed before clinical relevance.
The cytological characteristics of two modes of muscle hypertrophy were studied in the extensor digitorum longus muscle of the rat. Comprensatory hypertrophy (CH) was produced by tenotomy of the tibialis anterior muscle and work-induced hypertrophy (WIH) was produced by forced swimming of the animal. While both methods produced an increase in muscle weight and cell size, these two parameters did not correlate. Morphometric analyses of the hypertrophied muscle cells demonstrated that in CH-muscle there was an increase in mitochondrial volume density, a decrease in myofibrillar volume density and no change in sarcotubular or nuclear volume density. WIH-muscle demonstrated an increase in sarcotubular volume density but no change in mitochondrial, myofibrillar or nuclear volume density. It is concluded that in CH-muscle, the cell volume increase is attributable to mitochondrial volume increase and that there is no increase in the contratile myofibrillar component of the cell. WIH-muscle, on the other hand, has a cell volume increase which is attributable to a proportional increase in these organelles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David L. Seiden (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: