This study aims to comparatively examine the relationships between Bitcoin and Ethereum's energy consumption and price dynamics. Using daily frequency data, Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF), Phillips-Perron (PP), ARDL cointegration tests, and Toda–Yamamoto causality analysis were applied to evaluate the effects of cryptocurrency markets on energy demand from both short-term and long-term perspectives. The analysis results indicate that there is a long-term cointegration relationship between energy consumption and prices for Bitcoin and a unidirectional causality from prices to energy consumption. In contrast, ARDL boundary test results for Ethereum revealed no long-term relationship, and causality analysis also failed to detect any directional causality between price and energy consumption. This indicates that with Ethereum's transition to a Proof-of-Stake mechanism, energy consumption has become independent of price movements. The findings reveal that the effects of cryptocurrency markets on the energy economy vary according to technology-specific structural characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levent SEZAL (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: