Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper reports the results of a series of research projects which have aimed to evaluate the implications of climate change for food production and risk of hunger. results: (a) for IS92a (previously described as a 'business-as-usual' climate scenario); (b) for stabilization scenarios at 550 and 750 ppm and (c) for Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). The main conclusions are: (i) the region of greatest risk is Africa; (ii) stabilization at 750 ppm avoids some but not most of the risk, while stabilization at 550 ppm avoids most of the risk and (iii) the impact of climate change on risk of hunger is influenced greatly by pathways of development. For example, a SRES B2 development pathway is characterized by much lower levels of risk than A2; and this is largely explained by differing levels of income and technology not by differing amounts of climate forcing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parry et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: